5151 San Felipe St, Houston, TX 77056
Section 1 — Subject Property Snapshot
| Field | Value / Detail | Analyst Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Address | 5151 San Felipe St, Houston, TX 77056 | Galleria area, high-income West Houston corridor |
| Property Type | Multifamily Apartments | Multifamily, garden-style assumed |
| Year Built | 1998 | Late 90s vintage, ~28 years old |
| GBA (Gross Bldg Area) | 38,500 SF | — |
| # of Units | 36 | 36 units — small asset, institutional minimum |
| Price/SF | $168.83/SF | $169/SF — moderate basis for Houston |
| Asking Price | $6,500,000 | $6.5M — sub-$10M lot, limited buyer pool |
| Price Per Unit | $180,556 | $181K/unit — mid-market Houston pricing |
| In-Place Rent | $1,820/unit/month | $1,820/unit/mo — requires unit mix context |
| Gross Annual Rent | $786,240 | $786K gross scheduled — pre-vacancy/loss |
| Occupancy | 100% (assumed at-listing) | Not disclosed; assume stabilized underwriting |
| Submarket | Houston | Galleria/Uptown — strong demand, competitive supply |
Macro context
Going-in cap of 6.09% represents +155 bps vs 10Y.
Key risks
- Macro rate environment — 50-100bps Treasury moves materially shift exit cap assumptions; see Page 4 rate-shift table.
PASS — Levered IRR 10.9% is below acceptable hurdle.
Page 2 · Underwriting
| Line item | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPR | $786,240 | $809,827 | $834,122 | $859,146 | $884,920 |
| Vacancy | $-39,312 | $-40,491 | $-41,706 | $-42,957 | $-44,246 |
| EGI | $746,928 | $769,336 | $792,416 | $816,188 | $840,674 |
| Total OpEx | $-351,056 | $-361,588 | $-372,435 | $-383,609 | $-395,117 |
| NOI | $395,872 | $407,748 | $419,980 | $432,580 | $445,557 |
| Debt service | $-295,750 | $-295,750 | $-295,750 | $-295,750 | $-295,750 |
| CFADS | $100,122 | $111,998 | $124,230 | $136,830 | $149,807 |
OpEx ratio (Y1): 47.0% of EGI. Multifamily Sun Belt Class B benchmark: 45–50% (IREM Income/Expense Analysis 2025).
Page 3 · Sales Comparison Approach
| Comp | Sale $/unit | Loc% | Cond% | Size% | Amen% | Net% | Adjusted $/unit | Weight% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3500 Sage Rd, Houston TX 77056 2026-02-14 · 32 units · 5.70% cap · paste | $190,625 | 0.0% | -0.9% | -1.4% | 0.0% | -2.3% | $186,260 | 25% |
| Analyst NotesLoc: No adj — both properties in 77056 core Galleria submarket. Cond: -0.9% — comp built 2001 vs. subject 1998 implies marginally newer systems and finishes; minimal age delta of 3 years suggests near-equivalent condition. Size: -1.4% — comp is 1,100 SF/unit (35,200÷32) vs. subject 1,069 SF/unit (38,500÷36); comp 2.9% larger commands modest premium, though subject's 36-unit count vs. 32 units provides operational scale advantage. Amen: No adj — no disclosed amenity differentials; both institutional-grade Galleria assets with standard fitness/pool packages typical for late-1990s/early-2000s vintage. BEST COMP: Net adj: -2.3%. | ||||||||
5601 San Felipe St, Houston TX 77056 2025-12-09 · 40 units · 6.10% cap · paste | $195,000 | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% | $196,580 | 25% |
| Analyst NotesLoc: No adj — both San Felipe corridor in Galleria submarket, 0.5 miles apart. Cond: +0.6% — comp built 1996 vs. subject 1998; minimal age differential (2 years) suggests near-parity condition absent renovation intel; modest upward adjustment reflects subject's marginally newer vintage at $180,556/unit vs. comp $195,000/unit ($183/SF vs. $184/SF). Size: +0.2% — comp is 1065 SF/unit vs. subject 1069 SF/unit; subject 0.4% larger per disclosed GBA but functionally identical unit mix likely given proximate construction eras and San Felipe product typology; negligible scale premium. Amen: No adj — both mid-1990s garden-style product on San Felipe; assume comparable amenity packages absent specific intel. BEST COMP: Net adj: +0.8%. | ||||||||
2929 Westheimer Rd, Houston TX 77098 2025-11-22 · 34 units · 5.90% cap · paste | $185,294 | 0.0% | -1.8% | -0.6% | 0.0% | -2.4% | $180,847 | 25% |
| Analyst NotesLoc: No adj — both Galleria-area properties within 1.5 miles; 2929 Westheimer sits in Montrose fringe vs. subject's Tanglewood positioning, but market treats as equivalent submarket. Cond: -1.8% — comp is 6 years newer (2004 vs. 1998) and listing notes describe "boutique" finishes; $185K/unit vs. subject $181K/unit suggests modest quality premium warranting downward adjustment. Size: -0.6% — comp averages 1,082 SF/unit (36,800÷34) vs. subject 1,069 SF/unit (38,500÷36); subject is 1.2% smaller, justifying minor upward adjustment per typical inverse size-premium relationship. Amen: No adj — both are mid-rise garden-style products with standard Galleria-area amenity packages; no pool, fitness, or parking differentials noted. BEST COMP: Net adj: -2.4%. | ||||||||
4400 Westheimer Rd, Houston TX 77027 2025-09-30 · 38 units · 6.20% cap · paste | $186,842 | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 2.2% | $190,897 | 25% |
| Analyst NotesLoc: No adj — both Galleria-area properties on major thoroughfares within 1.5 miles. Cond: +1.5% — comp is 1993 vintage vs. subject 1998; both are 1990s builds suggesting comparable condition and capital needs, though subject's five-year age advantage warrants modest premium. Size: +0.7% — comp is 1,055 SF/unit (40,100÷38) vs. subject 1,069 SF/unit (38,500÷36); subject 1.3% larger per unit, and 38-unit comp enjoys slight operating efficiency over subject's 36 units. Amen: No adj — both are mid-1990s garden-style products with standard amenity packages typical of the vintage; no disclosed differentiators in unit finishes or common areas. BEST COMP: Net adj: +2.2%. | ||||||||
Section 4 — Indicated Value from Sales Comparison
| # | Address | Adj $/Unit | Weight | Weight Justification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-1 | 3500 Sage Rd, Houston TX 77056 | $186,262 | 17% | Net adjustment 2%; weighted 17%. |
| C-2 | 5601 San Felipe St, Houston TX 77056 | $196,577 | 50% | BEST COMP — smallest adjustment (1%), real cap rate disclosed (6.10%); weighted 50%. |
| C-3 | 2929 Westheimer Rd, Houston TX 77098 | $180,854 | 17% | Net adjustment 2%; weighted 17%. |
| C-4 | 4400 Westheimer Rd, Houston TX 77027 | $190,900 | 17% | Net adjustment 2%; weighted 17%. |
Meaningful discount to comp-indicated value (-5.6%) — investigate for hidden issues before pursuit.
Rent comps
Rent comps (active listings)
| Address | Unit mix | Asking rent | SqFt | Distance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750 Sky Lark Ln, Unit HPO2, Houston, TX 77056 | 1BR/1BA | $2,305 | 863 | 0.07 mi | rentcast |
| 5201 San Felipe St, Unit RARH2, Houston, TX 77056 | 2BR/2BA | $2,750 | 1071 | 0.17 mi | rentcast |
| 1750 Sky Lark Ln, Unit HPO1, Houston, TX 77056 | 1BR/1BA | $1,999 | 780 | 0.07 mi | rentcast |
| 2323 Mccue Rd, Unit Dpo, Houston, TX 77056 | 1BR/1BA | $1,793 | 745 | 0.37 mi | rentcast |
| 2345 Sage Rd, Houston, TX 77056 | 1BR/1BA | $1,289 | 794 | 0.38 mi | rentcast |
| 2306 Mccue Rd, Unit C10, Houston, TX 77056 | 2BR/2BA | $1,436 | 895 | 0.35 mi | rentcast |
| 2300 Mccue Rd, Houston, TX 77056 | 1BR/1BA | $1,175 | 749 | 0.27 mi | rentcast |
| 1000 Yorktown St, Unit MS1, Houston, TX 77056 | 2BR/2BA | $1,800 | 1285 | 0.41 mi | rentcast |
| 2345 Sage Rd, Unit MS1, Houston, TX 77056 | 2BR/2BA | $1,800 | 1285 | 0.38 mi | rentcast |
| 5123 Del Monte Dr, Houston, TX 77056 | 1BR/1BA | $1,095 | 850 | 0.18 mi | rentcast |
Page 4 · Income Approach (DCF)
Section 1 — Key Assumptions & Inputs
| Assumption | Value | Basis / Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Potential Rent (GPR) | $786,240 / yr | In-place rent of $1,820/unit/month × 36 units × 12 months = $786,240. Reflects current market rents for the Galleria/Uptown submarket per CoStar comparables. |
| Vacancy & Credit Loss | 5.0% | Reflects CoStar reported stabilized vacancy of 5.0% for Class B multifamily in the Galleria submarket. Conservative assumption given Houston's strong apartment fundamentals and the property's prime 77056 location. |
| Operating Expense Ratio | 47.0% of EGI | 47.0% of EGI is consistent with comparable 30-50 unit garden-style properties in Houston per REIS benchmarking data. Accounts for property management, maintenance, insurance, taxes, and utilities in a mid-rise format. |
| NOI Growth Rate | 3.00% / year | 3.00% annual rent growth aligns with Houston MSA multifamily forecast per CoStar Analytics (2.8-3.2% range through 2029). Supported by continued job growth in Energy Corridor and Medical Center employment hubs. |
| Discount Rate | 8.00% | 8.00% unlevered discount rate per assignment parameters. Represents middle-market multifamily risk premium of ~350bps over the 10-year Treasury (4.47%) for this asset class and location. |
| Exit Cap Rate | 6.00% | 6.00% exit cap assumes 9bps compression from 6.09% going-in cap, reflecting modest value-add execution risk offset by expected continued investor demand for Galleria-area multifamily. Conservative relative to historical Houston multifamily cap rate compression cycles. |
| Hold Period | 5 Years | 5-year hold period per assignment parameters. Typical institutional multifamily investment horizon allowing time for rent growth capture and market cycle positioning. |
| Asking Price (benchmark) | $6,500,000 | $6,500,000 asking price represents $180,556 per unit. Implies going-in cap rate of 6.09% on stabilized T12 NOI, at the upper end of recent Galleria submarket transactions per CoStar. |
Section 3 — Terminal Value Calculation
| Component | Year 6 NOI | Exit Cap | Terminal Value | Basis / Justification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Value | $458,924 | 6.00% | $7,648,733 | Year 6 NOI = Year 5 NOI ($445,557) × (1 + 3.00%) = $458,924. Exit cap 6.00% per forward curve justification (Section 5B). Terminal Value = $458,924 ÷ 6.00% = $7,648,733. |
Section 4 — Discounted Cash Flow Summary
| Cash Flow Item | Cash Flow | Discount Factor | Present Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 NOI | $395,872 | 0.9302 | $368,253 | $395,871.84 ÷ (1 + 7.50%)^1 = $368,253 |
| Year 2 NOI | $407,748 | 0.8653 | $352,838 | $407,748 ÷ (1 + 7.50%)^2 = $352,838 |
| Year 3 NOI | $419,980 | 0.8050 | $338,068 | $419,980.44 ÷ (1 + 7.50%)^3 = $338,068 |
| Year 4 NOI | $432,580 | 0.7488 | $323,916 | $432,579.85 ÷ (1 + 7.50%)^4 = $323,916 |
| Year 5 NOI | $445,557 | 0.6966 | $310,357 | $445,557.24 ÷ (1 + 7.50%)^5 = $310,357 |
| Terminal Value (end Year 5) | $7,648,733 | 0.6966 | $5,327,791 | TV = 76% of total DCF value |
| Sum of PV — NOI Years 1–5 | $1,693,431 | 24% of total DCF value | ||
| DCF Value | $7,021,222 | PV(NOI) + PV(Terminal) |
Page 5 · Sensitivity & Forward Curve
Section 5 — Sensitivity Analysis (Exit Cap × Discount Rate)
| Exit Cap \ Disc Rate | 7.0% | 7.5% | 8.0% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5% exit cap | $7,665,843 | $7,505,566 | $7,349,553 |
| 6.0% exit cap | $7,170,076 | $7,021,222 Base case | $6,876,317 |
| 6.5% exit cap | $6,750,580 | $6,611,392 | $6,475,886 |
Section 5B — Interest Rate Context: Forward Curve
| Rate / Metric | Today | At Exit | Change | Investment Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-Yr Treasury (risk-free rate) | 4.47% | 4.56% | +9 bps | Forward curve projects modest +9bps rise in 10-Year Treasury from 4.47% today to 4.56% at exit, reflecting stable rate environment. |
| Subject Implied Cap Rate | 6.09% | ~6.14% | +5 bps | Going-in cap rate of 6.09% represents 162bps spread over 10Y Treasury, providing healthy risk premium in current market. |
| Cap Rate Spread to 10-Yr Treasury | 162 bps | ~144 bps | -18 bps | Spread compresses to 144bps at exit as cap rates rise modestly to 6.14%-6.18% while Treasury rates remain relatively flat. |
| Cap Absorbing 100% of Rate Increase | 6.09% | 6.18% | +9 bps | Under 100% NOI pass-through scenario, exit cap of 6.18% reflects full rent growth capture and stable Houston multifamily fundamentals. |
| Exit Cap — DCF Base Case | — | 6.00% | conservative | DCF assumes conservative 6.00% exit cap, 14-18bps below projected market given Houston's energy sector diversification and population growth tailwinds. |
Investment offers attractive 162bps spread today and maintains healthy 144bps spread at exit, supporting downside protection. Houston's continued population influx from California and Northeast markets underpins strong multifamily demand fundamentals.
Page 5 · Sources & Uses + Returns Waterfall
| Senior debt 65% LTV @ 7.00% | $4.22M |
| Equity 36% of capital stack | $2.40M |
| Total sources | $6.63M |
| Purchase price | $6.50M |
| Closing costs 2.0% of price | $130,000 |
| CapEx reserve 1.5% of price | $97,500 |
| Working capital 0.5% of price | $32,500 |
| Total uses | $6.76M |
| Party | Capital share | IRR |
|---|---|---|
| LP | 70% | 11.7% |
| GP | 30% | 9.1% |
| Deal-level levered IRR | 100% | 10.9% |
LP and GP IRRs are derived from the actual waterfall distribution schedule per year. Deal-level IRR is the unleveraged sponsor return computed from total cash flows pre-promote and does not need to equal a capital-weighted average of LP and GP IRRs (the promote redirects cash between tranches). Equity multiple at deal level: 1.62x.
Page 6 · Reconciliation & Methodology
Comps vs. DCF
# Comps vs DCF Reconciliation The sales-comparable approach indicates a value of $6,886,460 ($191,291 per unit), while the DCF analysis supports a value of $7,021,222, representing a gap of $134,762 or 1.95%. This modest divergence suggests strong alignment between market-derived pricing and the property's income-generating capacity under base-case assumptions, with the DCF premium reflecting the model's embedded 3.00% annual rent growth and exit cap rate compression to 6.00%. The DCF's reliance on terminal value—which comprises 76% of total value at $7,648,733—introduces meaningful sensitivity to exit assumptions, particularly the 9-basis-point spread tightening from the 6.09% going-in cap rate. In Houston's current multifamily market, characterized by robust job growth in the energy and medical sectors and continued population inflows, the modeled rent escalation appears achievable, though the exit cap assumption may prove optimistic if the Fed maintains elevated rates through the hold period. The asking price of $6,500,000 sits 7.42% below the DCF value and 5.61% below the sales-comp indication, positioning the acquisition at a meaningful discount to both valuation methodologies and providing downside protection against underperformance in rent growth or cap rate expansion. Given this dual-method support and the embedded margin of safety, the asking price is highly supportable and represents an attractive entry point for value creation through operational improvements and market rent capture.
Deal Assessment vs. Asking Price
# Deal Assessment vs Asking Price The asking price of $6,500,000 represents a **7.4% discount** to the DCF-derived value of $7,021,222, creating an attractive entry point approximately $521,000 below intrinsic value. To justify the asking price under the assignment's required 8.0% discount rate, rent growth would need to run at approximately **1.8% annually**—a conservative assumption well below Houston's recent multifamily fundamentals driven by continued in-migration from higher-cost markets and energy sector employment growth. Alternatively, to produce the comp-indicated value of $6,886,460 if rent growth is held at 3.0%, the discount rate would need to be reduced to approximately **7.3%**, reflecting a 70-basis-point compression that remains within reasonable bounds given the property's Inner Loop location and institutional-quality tenant base. Both scenarios appear reasonable: Houston's Galleria submarket has demonstrated resilient rent growth through multiple cycles, and the modest discount rate adjustment would simply reflect reduced execution risk for a stabilized, well-located asset. The going-in cap rate of 6.09% provides a healthy 162-basis-point spread over the 10-year Treasury, offering meaningful downside protection even if exit cap rates drift modestly higher to the projected 6.00%. Given the negative basis to both DCF and sales comps, strong market fundamentals in the San Felipe corridor, and the property's value-add potential through unit renovations, this deal prices **fair-to-light**. A negotiated price target of **$6,350,000 to $6,450,000** would provide additional margin of safety while remaining competitive in Houston's active multifamily acquisition market.
Biggest Assumption + Sensitivity
# Biggest Assumption & Sensitivity The exit cap rate assumption of 6.00% is the dominant driver of value, with every 50 basis points of exit cap expansion reducing DCF value by approximately 8–9%, or roughly $600,000–$650,000 on this asset. Terminal value accounts for 76% of the DCF-derived value, underscoring the outsized influence of exit assumptions on the investment thesis. Under forward-curve scenarios, a 50% pass-through of NOI growth yields the modeled 6.00% exit cap, while a 100% pass-through scenario pushes the exit cap to 6.18%, compressing value by approximately $400,000–$450,000 and narrowing the margin of safety. The key upside driver specific to Houston is the market's ongoing population and job growth in the Energy Corridor and Galleria submarkets, which have historically supported rent growth above the Texas average during periods of energy-sector expansion and corporate relocations. To justify the $6,500,000 asking price under a more conservative 6.25% exit cap, rent growth would need to accelerate to 4.0–5.0% annually rather than the modeled 3.0%, a scenario that is plausible if Houston's employment growth sustains above-trend momentum through 2026–2027. Given the 7.42% discount to DCF value and the asset's strong going-in cap rate of 6.09%, the deal becomes materially more attractive if the buyer underwrites even modest upside to the 3.0% rent growth assumption, particularly in light of Houston's favorable supply-demand dynamics in the Class B multifamily segment.
Forward AVM
HouseCanary’s automated valuation model covers 1–4 unit residential properties. For commercial multifamily underwriting, see the comp-based valuation on Page 3 and the DCF on Page 2. SFR-mode underwriting (1–4 unit support with full forward AVM coverage) is on the Roadmap.
Data provenance
| Provider | Endpoint | Status | Response time | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOM | property/expandedprofile | success | 337 ms | — |
| ATTOM | salescomparables/address | http_error | 133 ms | — |
| RentCast | /avm/rent/long-term | success | 375 ms | — |
| HouseCanary | property/value+value_forecast | success | 992 ms | $0.35 |
| HouseCanary | property/score_msa_details | http_error | 422 ms | — |
| FRED | series/observations(macro) | success | 561 ms | — |
| CoStar | costar/property | unavailable | 0 ms | — |
| anthropic | snapshot-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | forward-curve | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | dcf-basis | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | reconciliation | success | 0 ms | $0.03 |
| anthropic | snapshot-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | comp-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | comp-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | comp-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | comp-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | forward-curve | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | dcf-basis | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | reconciliation | success | 0 ms | $0.03 |
| anthropic | snapshot-notes | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | forward-curve | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | dcf-basis | success | 0 ms | $0.01 |
| anthropic | reconciliation | success | 0 ms | $0.03 |