Field Property Partners
SFRSFR — detected from property type: Single Family

Pipeline

Last updated 5/16/2026, 2:00:38 AM
Status
Notes0/5000
Field Property Partners — SFR Investment Memo

215 E Park Ave, San Antonio, TX 78212

Single Family · 1 unit · Built 1915 · 1,836 sqft
PASS
Going-in cap
9.45%
Y1 cash-on-cash
13.4%
Levered IRR (5Y)
12.5%
Equity multiple
1.60x
Strategy
BUY-AND-HOLD
6.63
GRM

Macro context

2Y
4.16%
10Y
4.54%
30Y
5.05%
SOFR
3.53%

30-year mortgage rate proxy: 10Y + 250bps = 7.04% (vs underwriting rate 6.75%).

Source: FRED · 7/13/2026

HouseCanary AVM anchor

Current
$417k
1Y forward
$411k
3Y forward
$412k

Asking price $350k vs HC AVM $417k (-16.0% delta).

Key risks

  • DSCR below 1.10 — thin margin on debt coverage
  • Year-1 cash-on-cash below 4% — opportunity-cost vs treasuries
  • 5-year levered IRR below 8% — limited upside on appreciation assumptions
  • Deal classified marginal — requires concession on price, rent, or rehab scope
AVM ≠ purchase price

AVM ($417k) differs from purchase price ($350k) by 19.1%. Investigate before action — possible property-specific factors (condition, ownership type, undisclosed encumbrances).

PASS— strategy: BUY-AND-HOLD

5-yr levered IRR -9.9% with DSCR 0.08 does not clear residential return thresholds.

Page 2 · Year-1 Monthly Pro Forma

Line itemM1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12
GPR$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530$1,530
Vacancy$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77$-77
EGI$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454$1,454
Property tax$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833$-833
Insurance$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180$-180
Maintenance$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153$-153
PM fee$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116$-116
HOA$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
NOI$171$171$171$171$171$171$171$171$171$171$171$171
Debt service$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079$-2,079
Cash flow$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909$-1,909
Annual GPR
$18k
Annual NOI (Y1)
$2,049
Annual cash flow (Y1)
$-23k
DSCR (Y1)
1.62
GRM
6.63
Total cash invested
$95k

Page 3 · Property Value + Rent Comps

HouseCanary current AVM + forward forecast

Current AVM
$417k
1-year forward
$411k
3-year forward
$412k
5-year (extrapolated)
$408k

HC value_forecast returns monthly forecasts to 36 months; the 5-year value is extrapolated from the 36-month CAGR.

HouseCanary

Rent comps / RentCast AVM

AddressAsking rent$/sqft

Indicated value (residential): HouseCanary AVM is the canonical valuation for 1-4 unit properties — no sales-comp adjustment grid on SFR memos.

Page 4 · Sensitivities

Purchase price × Monthly rentCoC Y1
$1,377$1,454$1,530$1,606$1,683
$375k-20.6%-19.9%-19.2%-18.5%-17.8%
$396k-21.1%-20.5%-19.8%-19.1%-18.5%
$417k-21.6%-21.0%-20.4%-19.7%-19.1%
$438k-22.1%-21.5%-20.9%-20.3%-19.7%
$458k-22.5%-21.9%-21.3%-20.8%-20.2%
Appreciation × Hold periodLevered IRR
3yr5yr7yr
50% appr-22.2%-16.4%-13.2%
100% appr-15.7%-9.9%-7.0%
150% appr-9.8%-4.4%-1.9%
Rate shift × Hold periodLevered IRR
3yr5yr7yr
-0.75%-13.6%-8.1%-5.4%
-0.25%-15.0%-9.3%-6.4%
+0.00%-15.7%-9.9%-7.0%
+0.25%-16.4%-10.5%-7.5%
+0.75%-17.8%-11.8%-8.6%
Break-even monthly rent (cash flow = 0): $3,996 / month

Page 5 · Strategy Analysis — BUY-AND-HOLD

5-year cash flow + equity build

LineY1Y2Y3Y4Y5
GPR$18k$19k$20k$20k$21k
NOI$2,049$2,121$2,195$2,272$2,352
Cash flow$-23k$-23k$-23k$-23k$-23k

Page 6 · Reconciliation & Methodology

Forward AVM

Current
$417k
1Y
$411k
3Y
$412k
5Y (ext.)
$408k

Data layer used: housecanary

Strategy fit

Flagged as marginal, the deal presents a surface-level contradiction: a 13.4% cash-on-cash return, 1.62 DSCR, and 12.5% five-year levered IRR all clear buy-and-hold thresholds comfortably, yet the classifier's CoC of -20.4% and DSCR of 0.08 suggest the underwriting contains two materially different financing or income scenarios, and the weaker set dominates the classification. The HouseCanary AVM of $416,719 against a $350,000 purchase price implies roughly $66,719 of apparent basis cushion, but with no ARV established and a $0 rehab budget, that spread is better read as a valuation discrepancy than actionable equity — particularly when the DCF-derived metrics significantly exceed the comp-anchored value, which typically signals aggressive income or exit assumptions rather than genuine monetizable upside. To migrate cleanly into a buy-and-hold classification, the deal requires reconciliation of the two DSCR figures into a single defensible financing structure, confirmation that the 9.45% going-in cap is supported by stabilized in-place rents rather than pro forma projections, and an ARV established through sales comps to validate whether the 1.60x equity multiple is achievable at exit. Until those inputs are resolved and the -20.4% CoC scenario is either explained or eliminated, the marginal classification is the correct holding position.

Return profile vs strategy norm

At a 9.45% going-in cap rate, the deal prices well above the 5.5%–7.0% range typical for Sun Belt single-family buy-and-hold acquisitions, which ordinarily signals either a distressed asset, a below-market rent, or aggressive income assumptions embedded in the underwriting. The 13.4% cash-on-cash and 1.62x DSCR are both strong on their face — CoC sits roughly 300–500 basis points above the 8%–10% threshold most mid-market residential operators require to clear a buy-and-hold hurdle, and a DSCR of 1.62 provides meaningful debt-service cushion. The 5-year levered IRR of 12.5% and 1.60x equity multiple are respectable but not exceptional for this strategy class, landing near the midpoint of the 10%–15% IRR range institutional and semi-institutional Sun Belt operators target, with no meaningful promote-level upside. The more important flag is the gap between the $350,000 purchase price and the $416,719 AVM: rather than confirming monetizable equity, that spread most likely reflects the income assumptions required to justify the 9.45% cap rate, and until rent rolls and lease comps are stress-tested against market, the headline returns should be treated as model outputs, not executable performance.

Risk factors

Despite a 13.4% cash-on-cash return and 1.62 DSCR that appear healthy in isolation, the "marginal" classification flags a conflicting scenario where an alternative underwriting cut produces a CoC of -20.4% and a DSCR of 0.08, signaling that the base-case figures are highly sensitive to rent, vacancy, or financing assumptions and should not be taken at face value. The HouseCanary AVM of $416,719 against a $350,000 purchase price represents a $66,719 apparent discount, but with no ARV established and a $0 rehab budget, that spread is a DCF artifact rather than confirmed monetizable equity — a pattern that typically reflects aggressive income assumptions rather than genuine basis advantage. At a GRM of 6.63, the deal prices in near-full occupancy with minimal friction; any sustained vacancy or rent concession compresses net income sharply against a $350,000 debt-service obligation, and the 5-yr levered IRR of 12.5% with a 1.60x equity multiple leaves little margin to absorb a softening San Antonio market without falling below return thresholds. The absence of an ARV estimate further prevents stress-testing an exit, meaning the entire return thesis rests on hold-period income performance with no confirmed reversion value as a backstop.

Methodology — SFR mode underwrites 1-4 unit residential using HouseCanary AVM as the indicated value, RentCast for rent comps, and an amortizing 30-year P&I debt schedule. Strategy classification is rule-based on cash-on-cash, DSCR, rehab ratio, and ARV-to-basis.

CFP underwriting

Upload your Cashflow Portal export or enter the key figures manually. Each save creates a new version.