215 E Park Ave, San Antonio, TX 78212
Macro context
30-year mortgage rate proxy: 10Y + 250bps = 7.04% (vs underwriting rate 6.75%).
HouseCanary AVM anchor
Asking price $350k vs HC AVM $417k (-16.0% delta).
Key risks
- DSCR below 1.10 — thin margin on debt coverage
- Year-1 cash-on-cash below 4% — opportunity-cost vs treasuries
- 5-year levered IRR below 8% — limited upside on appreciation assumptions
- Deal classified marginal — requires concession on price, rent, or rehab scope
AVM ($417k) differs from purchase price ($350k) by 19.1%. Investigate before action — possible property-specific factors (condition, ownership type, undisclosed encumbrances).
5-yr levered IRR -9.9% with DSCR 0.08 does not clear residential return thresholds.
Page 2 · Year-1 Monthly Pro Forma
| Line item | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 | M9 | M10 | M11 | M12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPR | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 | $1,530 |
| Vacancy | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 | $-77 |
| EGI | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 | $1,454 |
| Property tax | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 | $-833 |
| Insurance | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 | $-180 |
| Maintenance | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 | $-153 |
| PM fee | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 | $-116 |
| HOA | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| NOI | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 | $171 |
| Debt service | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 | $-2,079 |
| Cash flow | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 | $-1,909 |
Page 3 · Property Value + Rent Comps
HouseCanary current AVM + forward forecast
HC value_forecast returns monthly forecasts to 36 months; the 5-year value is extrapolated from the 36-month CAGR.
Rent comps / RentCast AVM
| Address | Asking rent | $/sqft |
|---|
Indicated value (residential): HouseCanary AVM is the canonical valuation for 1-4 unit properties — no sales-comp adjustment grid on SFR memos.
Page 4 · Sensitivities
| $1,377 | $1,454 | $1,530 | $1,606 | $1,683 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $375k | -20.6% | -19.9% | -19.2% | -18.5% | -17.8% |
| $396k | -21.1% | -20.5% | -19.8% | -19.1% | -18.5% |
| $417k | -21.6% | -21.0% | -20.4% | -19.7% | -19.1% |
| $438k | -22.1% | -21.5% | -20.9% | -20.3% | -19.7% |
| $458k | -22.5% | -21.9% | -21.3% | -20.8% | -20.2% |
| 3yr | 5yr | 7yr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50% appr | -22.2% | -16.4% | -13.2% |
| 100% appr | -15.7% | -9.9% | -7.0% |
| 150% appr | -9.8% | -4.4% | -1.9% |
| 3yr | 5yr | 7yr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -0.75% | -13.6% | -8.1% | -5.4% |
| -0.25% | -15.0% | -9.3% | -6.4% |
| +0.00% | -15.7% | -9.9% | -7.0% |
| +0.25% | -16.4% | -10.5% | -7.5% |
| +0.75% | -17.8% | -11.8% | -8.6% |
Page 5 · Strategy Analysis — BUY-AND-HOLD
5-year cash flow + equity build
| Line | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPR | $18k | $19k | $20k | $20k | $21k |
| NOI | $2,049 | $2,121 | $2,195 | $2,272 | $2,352 |
| Cash flow | $-23k | $-23k | $-23k | $-23k | $-23k |
Page 6 · Reconciliation & Methodology
Forward AVM
Data layer used: housecanary
Flagged as marginal, the deal presents a surface-level contradiction: a 13.4% cash-on-cash return, 1.62 DSCR, and 12.5% five-year levered IRR all clear buy-and-hold thresholds comfortably, yet the classifier's CoC of -20.4% and DSCR of 0.08 suggest the underwriting contains two materially different financing or income scenarios, and the weaker set dominates the classification. The HouseCanary AVM of $416,719 against a $350,000 purchase price implies roughly $66,719 of apparent basis cushion, but with no ARV established and a $0 rehab budget, that spread is better read as a valuation discrepancy than actionable equity — particularly when the DCF-derived metrics significantly exceed the comp-anchored value, which typically signals aggressive income or exit assumptions rather than genuine monetizable upside. To migrate cleanly into a buy-and-hold classification, the deal requires reconciliation of the two DSCR figures into a single defensible financing structure, confirmation that the 9.45% going-in cap is supported by stabilized in-place rents rather than pro forma projections, and an ARV established through sales comps to validate whether the 1.60x equity multiple is achievable at exit. Until those inputs are resolved and the -20.4% CoC scenario is either explained or eliminated, the marginal classification is the correct holding position.
At a 9.45% going-in cap rate, the deal prices well above the 5.5%–7.0% range typical for Sun Belt single-family buy-and-hold acquisitions, which ordinarily signals either a distressed asset, a below-market rent, or aggressive income assumptions embedded in the underwriting. The 13.4% cash-on-cash and 1.62x DSCR are both strong on their face — CoC sits roughly 300–500 basis points above the 8%–10% threshold most mid-market residential operators require to clear a buy-and-hold hurdle, and a DSCR of 1.62 provides meaningful debt-service cushion. The 5-year levered IRR of 12.5% and 1.60x equity multiple are respectable but not exceptional for this strategy class, landing near the midpoint of the 10%–15% IRR range institutional and semi-institutional Sun Belt operators target, with no meaningful promote-level upside. The more important flag is the gap between the $350,000 purchase price and the $416,719 AVM: rather than confirming monetizable equity, that spread most likely reflects the income assumptions required to justify the 9.45% cap rate, and until rent rolls and lease comps are stress-tested against market, the headline returns should be treated as model outputs, not executable performance.
Despite a 13.4% cash-on-cash return and 1.62 DSCR that appear healthy in isolation, the "marginal" classification flags a conflicting scenario where an alternative underwriting cut produces a CoC of -20.4% and a DSCR of 0.08, signaling that the base-case figures are highly sensitive to rent, vacancy, or financing assumptions and should not be taken at face value. The HouseCanary AVM of $416,719 against a $350,000 purchase price represents a $66,719 apparent discount, but with no ARV established and a $0 rehab budget, that spread is a DCF artifact rather than confirmed monetizable equity — a pattern that typically reflects aggressive income assumptions rather than genuine basis advantage. At a GRM of 6.63, the deal prices in near-full occupancy with minimal friction; any sustained vacancy or rent concession compresses net income sharply against a $350,000 debt-service obligation, and the 5-yr levered IRR of 12.5% with a 1.60x equity multiple leaves little margin to absorb a softening San Antonio market without falling below return thresholds. The absence of an ARV estimate further prevents stress-testing an exit, meaning the entire return thesis rests on hold-period income performance with no confirmed reversion value as a backstop.